<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://impeachpac.org">
<channel>
 <title>ImpeachPAC - Politics of Impeachment</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Impeachment FAQ</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/impeachfaq</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b &gt;FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT IMPEACHMENT&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.charlottesvillepeace.org/impeachfaq&quot;&gt;Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b &gt;Why would we want a President Cheney?  Or why would we want a new Republican who could run as an incumbent?  Or why would we want a President Pelosi?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/9">Grounds for Impeachment</category>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/10">Impeachment in the News</category>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/5">Impeachment Process</category>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:53:41 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>We Put Impeachment on the Table on April 25 at the U.S. Capitol</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/node/3590</link>
 <description>&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:51:11 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Demos Defeat Measure Seeking Impeachment</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/node/3514</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Demos defeat measure seeking impeachment&lt;br /&gt;
By Elaine Jarvik&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,660216118,00.html&quot;&gt;Deseret Morning News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;      With one of their own serving as the county&#039;s mayor and the U.S. Congress now in their party&#039;s hands, Salt Lake County Democrats were in an upbeat mood Saturday at their annual convention.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:27:51 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Democrats&#039; Open-Mic Press Conferences</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/node/2619</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By David Swanson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike the previous majority party in Congress, the Democrats who take power today know their weaknesses.  They know they&#039;re not very good at the whole press conference thing where you&#039;re supposed to stand there and say something people care about.  So they&#039;ve announced an open-mic policy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:07:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RNC Line on Impeachment: Verily, This Is That</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/node/1129</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By David Swanson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Black is white.  War is peace.  Impeachment is good for Republicans.  Haven&#039;t you heard?  The Republicans say so.  The Democrats say so.  It just must BE so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And yet there isn&#039;t a shred of evidence to support it.  Usually when we hear that a minimum wage is bad for low-income workers or tax cuts for billionaires benefit the poor, or any such apparently upside-down fantasy, we are at least given semi-plausible theories for how those lies could be truths.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 15:58:12 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Espanol</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/espanol</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Key documents in Spanish:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://impeachpac.org/pointssp&quot;&gt;Mensaje&lt;/a&gt; (Talking Points)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://impeachpac.org/citizens-guidesp&quot;&gt;Guía de los Ciudadanos&lt;/a&gt; (Citizen&#039;s guide)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://impeachpac.org/reasonssp&quot;&gt;Razones&lt;/a&gt; (Reasons for Impeachment)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:37:51 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Talking Points - SPANISH</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/pointssp</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Translation provided by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latinosforamerica.com&quot;&gt;www.latinosforamerica.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“La palabra inglesa ‘impeachment’, que puede traducirse aproximadamente como acusación o impugnación, se refiere al proceso, prescrito por la Constitución de Estados Unidos, mediante el cual un presidente, vicepresidente u otro oficial civil estadounidense puede ser separado de su cargo por el Congreso”.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:32:51 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Citizen&#039;s Guide to Impeachment - SPANISH</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/citizens-guidesp</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Please send us improvements to this translation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Por David Waldman  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;¿Una resolución de la acusación? ¡Fresco! ¿Puede ser hecha en mi ciudad?&lt;br /&gt;
Puede sí. Y puedes hacerla. Una de las cosas más notables sobre este movimiento es que hay gente por todas partes - incluso donde lo menos lo cuentas con - que sean tan justos que convencido pues eres que algo tiene que ser hecho. Sí, republicanos uniformes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:29:50 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Impeachment?</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/points</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/pointssp&quot;&gt;SPANISH VERSION&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Talking Points&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While impeachment is a very serious step that should not have been trivialized the way it was during the last presidential administration, it is also an indispensable part of a system of checks and balances that sustains our democracy.  When strong evidence exists of the most serious crimes, we must use impeachment or lose the ability of the legislative branch to compell the executive branch to obey the law.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 20:49:07 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Impeachment: JUST DO IT!</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/impeachment-just-do-it</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/02/14/impeach_yes_but.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;TomPaine.com&lt;/a&gt;, Constitutional Law professor (and Maryland State Senate candidate) Jamie Raskin devotes 1,440 words to impeachment. After laying out a few of the most important reasons for impeachment, Raskin confronts the reality that Republicans control Congress - and the resulting cowardice of House Democrats who don&#039;t want to pick a fight they believe they will lose.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:53:50 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Debating Impeachment Among Democrats</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/node/503</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By David Swanson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you even imagine Republicans, even if they were in a minority in Congress, debating whether or not to call for the impeachment of a Democratic president known and documented as guilty of a wide range of high crimes and misdemeanors?  In particular, if you can imagine that, can you imagine the Republicans who opposed impeachment arguing that they were doing so for strategic political reasons?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:13:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Arianna is Wrong on Impeachment</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/arianna-wrong-on-impeachment</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;David Swanson responded brilliantly to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/you-want-to-discuss-impea_b_15371.html&quot;&gt;Arianna Huffington&#039;s wrongheaded argument against impeachment&lt;/a&gt;. I wanted to echo David and add a few more points on &lt;a href=&quot;http://democrats.com/arianna-wrong-on-impeachment&quot;&gt;Why Arianna is Wrong on Impeachment&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:30:03 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DCCC Survey Write-in Campaign for Impeachment</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/dccc-survey-2006</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I just received a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccc.org/get_involved/dccc_survey_02102006&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;survey from the DCCC&lt;/a&gt;. Of course all they want is our money, but they claim:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;margin-right: 0px&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to provide you with resources you need and to understand what Democratic activists like you want from the DCCC, please take the survey &lt;strong&gt;so we can learn from each other&lt;/strong&gt; -- because only together can America do better. We are spending the month of February &lt;strong&gt;gathering information and will send you a survey report at the end of the month&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:07:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Impeachment Versus Arianna</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/node/479</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Impeachment Versus Arianna&lt;br /&gt;
By David Swanson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joe Scarborough hosted a discussion of impeachment last night on MSNBC.  Here&#039;s the transcript:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11256483/&quot;&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11256483/&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were four guests, two explicitly labeled as liberals, and two as conservatives.  The conservatives were Tucker Carlson and Pat Buchanan.  The liberals were Liz Holtzman and Arianna Huffington.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:20:50 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maxine Waters Says Bush&#039;s Spying Is Impeachable Offense</title>
 <link>http://impeachpac.org/waters-spying</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a short &lt;a href=&quot;http://afterdowningstreet.org/downloads/maxineclip.mp3&quot;&gt;audio clip&lt;/a&gt; from the Alternative State of the Union event hosted by the Progressive Caucus, the Nation Magazine, and the Institute for Policy Studies.  The only voice you&#039;ll hear will be that of Congresswoman Maxine Waters, speaking about Bush, and saying:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/9">Grounds for Impeachment</category>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/10">Impeachment in the News</category>
 <category domain="http://impeachpac.org/taxonomy/term/11">Politics of Impeachment</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:26:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
